Still, Standing Still

Wounded, Bewildered, Desolated

Destitute, Diverted, Deluded

Taking hike in all these vast oceans

Sulking into sinking ship

Wondering my life could be

With or without you

 

Rather hurt than feel nothing at all

Lost in the maze

Enjoying the pain, trying to take it all

Wondering what my life could be

With or without you

 

Colours of emotions are all vain

Betraying time took a howl

While I was trying it to be tame

Wondering was it all vain?

What my life could be

With or without you.

Still holding hand, feeling the warmth.

Still waiting, just once, only once for your smile

Still, still I stand still in that moment.

Still wish I could turn this wheel

Could steer it the way I feel

Can bring you back and snatch all the moment.

And wondering what my life could be

With or without you.

Student: Ruchika Sharma

We invite you to participate in our 2018 AIJ Research Competition!

We invite you to participate in our 2018 AIJ Research Competition!

The topic is open, and any high school and college students from any country can participate.

Submissions should be research proposals or abstracts. Please indicate your contact information.

Please submit to admin@asiatic-insights.org.

We will announce finalists in June 2018.

We look forward to your participation!

Education Impacts of Urban-Rural Gap

城乡差距对于教育的影响
随着中国科学技术与经济实力的日积月累,中国的经济实力已经在全球取得了突破性的成绩。我们的社会主义价值观取得了极大的成就而正是因为我们国家有着以人为本的教育理念,推进素质发展。彰显出了教育对一个国家的重要性。
作为一个发展中的农业大国,知识的重要性不言而喻了,加强以及投资现代化教育成了现在的一大任务。据有关数据显示,我国的总人口为14亿,而所注册的农村人口就达到了8亿,约占总人口的57%,而农村与城市的人口之比更是达到了4:3。而现在,在一些农村,教育上的细小问题也在慢慢地暴露出来,这些问题不仅大大地限制了农村地区经济的发展,也将孩子们培养学习的兴趣,义务教育制度的实施增添了许多麻烦。而问题所在则是教育资源。教育资源,共分为两种,师资力量资源,以及教育器材资源。
1.师资资源:由于生活环境条件的艰辛,在2010-2013年间,乡村教师的流失量由427万降到了330万,短短的三年内,流失量就达到了142.5万,流失率高达30%。而这些原因并不是因为工资所造成的,据统计一名乡村教师的月薪可达到4511元,而城市教师的工资只有3500元左右。对此政府为鼓励乡村教师对其提供了许多的福利及政策,如一些城市直接聘请满30年教龄的乡村教师高级教师的荣誉称号。
2.教学设备:在大城市里,眼花缭乱的多媒体教学已经实现了多媒体的教学方式,电子白板几乎普遍出现在学生眼前,在城里孩子眼里已经变得索然无味的电子白板或许在乡村孩子眼里是一个缤纷五彩的新世界。
随着时间的推移,各种福利保障制度更加完善,我相信在不远的将来,农村孩子们也会体验到学习的乐趣。

Scholastic Art & Writing Awards

Since 1923, the Scholastic Art & Writing Awards have recognized the vision, ingenuity, and talent of our nation’s youth, and provided opportunities for creative teens to be celebrated. Each year, increasing numbers of teens participate in the program, and become a part of our community–-young artists and writers, filmmakers and photographers, poets, and sculptors, along with countless educators who support and encourage the creative process.

Students across America submitted 300,000 original works during our 2015 program year across 28 different categories of art and writing.

The Awards are presented by the Alliance for Young Artists & Writers, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization whose mission is to identify students with exceptional artistic and literary talent and present their remarkable work to the world through the Scholastic Art & Writing Awards. Students receive opportunities for recognition, exhibition, publication, and scholarship.

Since its founding, the Awards have established an amazing track record for identifying the early promise of our nation’s most accomplished and prolific creative leaders. Alumni include artists Andy Warhol, Philip Pearlstein, Cy Twombly, Robert Indiana, Kay WalkingStick, and John Baldessari; writers Sylvia Plath, Truman Capote, Bernard Malamud, Myla Goldberg, and Joyce Carol Oates; photographer Richard Avedon (who won for poetry); actors Frances Farmer, Robert Redford, Alan Arkin, and John Lithgow; and filmmakers Stan Brakhage, Ken Burns, and Richard Linklater. Outside the arts, Awards alumni employ their creativity to become successful in any number of ways – leaders in fields including journalism, medicine, finance, government and public service, the law, science, design, and more.

Students’ submissions are blindly judged by leaders in the visual and literary arts. Many past award recipients have lent their expertise as jurors, including Michael Bierut, Phillip Pearlstein, Edward Sorel, Red Grooms and Gary Panter, and they have been joined by luminaries including Judy Blume, Billy Collins, Robert Frost, Paul Giamatti, Langston Hughes, Francine Prose, David Sedaris, Lesley Stahl, and Roz Chast. Jurors look for works that exemplify the Awards’ core values:  originality, technical skill, and the emergence of personal voice or vision.

Today, we work with more than 100 affiliate partners across the country to bring the Awards to local communities. Teens in grades 7 through 12, from public, private, or home schools, can apply in 28 categories of art and writing for their chance to earn scholarships and have their works exhibited and published. Students also submit work for sponsored awards including Duck Tape®, Golden Paints and Gedenk – and for special honors like the National Student Poets Program, a joint project between the President’s Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, the Institute for Museum and Library Services, and the Alliance for Young Artists & Writers.

Year after year the Scholastic Awards program grows with increased participation from students and increasing scholarships and recognition opportunities.

With 90 years of history behind us and a bright future ahead, the Scholastic Art & Writing Awards has grown to be the nation’s longest-running, most prestigious recognition initiative for creative teens, and the largest source of scholarships for young artists and writers. Join us as a student, educator, affiliate, partner, or supporter and claim your place within our nation’s creative legacy.

 

 

http://www.artandwriting.org/the-awards/categories/#ScienceFiction

Looking Deeper into the Factors Regulating Global Innovation with PCA and Rough Sets

Abstract – A country’s economic and industrial
progress is strongly governed by the level of its
innovation. However, the conditions that influence and
encourage stronger innovation trends are difficult to
determine, and this is due in part to the lack of a clear
consensus among diverse indicators of an economy’s
innovative capacity as well as to the complex relations
between such factors. This study independently
analyzes a few representative indicators of innovation
for various input variables considered to enable
innovation and ranks and selects them based on two
different analysis paradigms. One draws an overall
picture of relationships and interactions between
different variables and describes the position of
significant countries, and the other selects a set of
relevant features to extract rules typifying this
multifaceted interaction. A good consensus is observed
for these two analysis paradigms.

Jinhang Du, Xin Song, Zhen Wang, Sungho Park, Tianchen Shi